Self-Strengthement Movement and 100 Days Reforms through Classical Elites Theory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper used the comparative case study model to test the assumptions of classical elite theory. Analyzing the Chinese reformation attempt during the Qing dynasty revealed the limited scope of actions of the leaders. The existence of national elites limits their political environment. However, leaders' motivations and strategies can vary by choosing different factions. Analyzing such relations is the key to understanding why reformation was carried out or not successfully. Theoretical test of classical elites' assumptions revealed that they can explain how elites keep the power, but further elaboration is needed whether reforms can succed or fail.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the WILAYAH implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report or abstract), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that all co-authors have approved its publication. The WILAYAH : International Journal of East Asian Studies adopts CC BY license. As such, we would be grateful if an acknowledgement accompanies the republication that the work was originally published in WILAYAH. The editors will ensure digital preservation of access to the journal content by the Journal depository section.
Disclaimer
Although the Department of East Asian Studies is the publisher of the WILAYAH : International Journal of East Asian Studies, the views presented in the WILAYAH are entirely those of the contributors and do not reflect the official stand of the Department of East Asian Studies. The Department does not hold itself responsible for the accuracy of any article published. Publisher and co-publishers assume no responsibility, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libellous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
References
Channel, C. M. (Director). (2022). General History of China EP97 | The self-strengthening Movement [Motion Picture].
Mauch, P. (2014). Japanese Intellectual Responses to China’s Rise. In N. Horesh, & E. Kavalski, Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rowe, W. T. (2012). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. Harward University Press.
Burnham, J. (1943). The Machiavellians. Henry Regnery Company.
Han, C. (2017). A Historical Overview of the Impact of the Reformation on East Asia. Consensus, https://doi.org/10.51644/KXNK9059, 1-27.
Elman, B. A. (2004). Naval Warfare and the Refraction of China's Self-Strengthening Reforms into Scientific and Technological Failure, 1865-1895. Modern Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X04001088, 283-326.
Dictionary.cambridge.org. (n.d.). https://dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/elite: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/elite
Haver, Z. (2020, September 29). https://foreignpolicy.com. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/29/american-leaders-sold-changing-china-engagement/: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/29/american-leaders-sold-changing-china-engagement/
Milne, R. S. (1966). Political Modernization and Development. Pacific Affairs, 135-144.
Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. (2009). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. London: Cambridge University Press.
Pakulski, J. (2018). Theories of Political Elites. In M. Cotta, U. H.-L. Jean-Pascal Dalo, J. Pakulski, & E. Semenova, The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites (pp. 7-9). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pareto, V. (1935). The Mind and Society. Jonathan Caple Ltd.
Mosca, G. (1939). The Ruling Class. Mcgrav Hill Company.
Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties. Hearst's International Library.
Pareto, V. (1935). The Mind and Society. Jonathan Caple Ltd.
Huang, P. (1998). Theory and the Study of Modern Chinese History: Four Traps and a Question. Modern Chinese History Research. Paradigmatic Issues in Chinese Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049802400206. , 183-208.
Elman, B. A. (2004). Naval Warfare and the Refraction of China's Self-Strengthening Reforms into Scientific and Technological Failure, 1865-1895. Modern Asian Studies, 283-326.
Jason Seawright, J. G. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077, 294-308.
Soo, F. (1989). China and Modernization: Past and Present a Discussion. Studies in Soviet Thought, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00838019, 3-54.
Foucault, M. (2024). Power Knowledge. Random House.
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Burnham, J. (1943). The Machiavellians. Henry Regnery Company.
Higley, J. (2009). Elite Theory and Elites. In &. J. T. Leicht, Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective (pp. 161-176). Springer Science and Business Media.
Kollmorgen, R. (2009). Modernization Theories. In R. K.-J. Wolfgang Merkel, The Handbook of Political Social, and Economic Transformation (p. 55). Oxford University Press.
Bruckner, J. (2009). Structuralism. In R. K.-J. Wolfgang Merkel, Political, Social, and Economic Transformation (pp. 73-84). Oxford Press.
Banno, M. (1964). China and West 1858-61. Harvard University Press.
Ven, H. v. (2004). Breaking with the Past. Columbia University Press.
Verlag, H. (2014). Sovereignty, Self-strengthening, and Steamships in Late Imperial China. Journal of Asian History, https://doi.org/10.13173/jasiahist.48.1.0081, 81-111.
Smith, R. (1976). Foreign-Training and China's Self-Strengthening: The Case Of Feng-Huang-Shan 1864-1873. Modern Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X0000593X, 195-223.
Eastman, L. (1968). Political Reformism In China Before The Sino-Japanese War. The Journal Of Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.2307/2051574, 695-710.
Rowe, W. T. (2012). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. Harward University Press.
Huang, P. (1985). The Grand Council of the Ch'ing Dynasty: A Historiographical Study. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, https://doi.org/10.2307/2049372, 502-515.
Griffis, W. E. (1916). The Statesmanship of Yuan Shi Kai. The North American Review, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25108866, 70-74.
Ichiko, C. (1980). Political and Institutional reform 1900-11. In J. F. Denis Twitchett, Cambridge History of China (pp. 375-403). Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, R. R. (2003). The Lessons of Defeat: Transforming the Qing State after the Boxer War. Modern Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X03004013, 769-773.
Kadercan, B. (2014). Strong Armies, Slow Adaptation: Civil-Military Relations and the Diffusion of Military Power. International Security, https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00146, 117-152.
Juan Linz, A. S. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Selwood, D. (2014, March 18). https://www.dominicselwood.com. Retrieved from https://www.dominicselwood.com/my-journalism/a-stain-on-history-the-burning-of-jacques-de-molay-grand-master-of-the-mysterious-knights-templar-700-years-ago-today/: https://www.dominicselwood.com/my-journalism/a-stain-on-history-the-burning-of-jacques-de-molay-grand-master-of-the-mysterious-knights-templar-700-years-ago-today/
Hagemann, E. (1942). The Persecution of the Christians in Japan in the Middle of the Seventeenth Century. Pacific Historical Review, https://doi.org/10.2307/3633765, 151-160.
Zhao, D. (2015). The Confucian-Legalist State. Oxford University Press.
Marx, K. (1844). https://www.marxists.org. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/index.htm: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/index.htm
Waley, A. (1989). The Analects of Confucius. Vintage.
Basu, D. (2014). Chinese Xenology and the Opium War: Reflections on Sinocentrism. The Journal of Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002191181400103X, 927-940.
Ping Huang et al. (2021). A ‘correlative’ turn for transition studies on China. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.017, 99-101.
Bryan S. et al. (2016). The Dominant Ideology Thesis. Routledge.